Understanding Community Assoc. Leasing Restrictions
Understanding Leasing Restrictions Contact Information

By: Michael Rome, J.D.

This article is not a substitute for consulting with legal counsel in your State regarding the specific fact situation.

         It has become common for associations to add leasing restrictions to the covenants. The
most typical limitation is to restrict the total number of homes that can be rented at any one
time. The Georgia courts have ruled that associations have the authority to amend the covenants in this way, and have also approved enforcement of these provisions through the use of fines.

      There are several reasons for this trend. First, many neighborhoods want to retain the
character of an owner-occupied subdivision as opposed to a rental community. Sometimes
tenants are less invested in their surroundings because they lease rather than own. This can result in a greater enforcement problem for the Association and even cause a depreciation of property values. Secondly, absentee owners can be difficult to locate, and therefore impossible to communicate with regarding participation in voting and maintenance issues.

      Another consideration is Section 8 renters. (See article on Section 8 leasing.) Those who
qualify for Section 8 assistance are issued coupons that they can use to rent in whatever
subdivision they choose. The landlord turns in the coupons for cash.

      Leasing caps usually vary from 5% to 15%, along with any hardship exceptions as
allowed in the discretion of the Board. Examples of hardship exceptions include; active military
deployment, recent death of a spouse, terminal illness, and inability to sell at fair market value
after a certain period of time. Some associations ban all rentals aside from hardship exceptions.

      An important issue is grandfathering provisions. There are three typical variations to
      Active Leases. Any leases in effect when the restrictions are filed on the deed
records are allowed to continue until such time as the lease expires or until the current tenants no longer occupy the home. 
      Owners Who Are Leasing. An alternative is to grandfather the owners who are currently renting rather than just grandfathering the lease. This gives the owner the right to rent numerous times outside the restrictions until there is a transfer of title. The future owners would then be subject to the leasing restrictions. 
      All Current Owners. This encompasses all owners in the subdivision at the time the restrictions are filed on the deed records, whether or not they are leasing. Any future owners would be controlled by the leasing restrictions. This is the least common approach. It is either used in very small subdivisions or when the Board feels it is the only way to obtain the amount of votes required to pass the leasing restriction amendment.

      Under Georgia law, covenants should be subject to the Georgia Property Owners
Association Act (“POA”) in order to add provisions that are more restrictive than those in the
original covenants. Therefore, if the association’s covenants are not already under the POA, the amendment will have to include adding the POA. If the Association does not, then the Lots of
the owners who did not vote for the leasing restrictions will not be subject to them, and neither
will the subsequent purchasers. Condominiums do not have this concern because they are usually already subject to the Georgia Condominium Act, which allows restrictive amendments.

      Some owners are opposed to leasing restrictions because “The association should not be
able to tell you what you can do with your property.” Using this logic, the association should
also not be able to require pre-approval for additions or improvements to your house, etc...  One of the main purposes of an association is to help protect the quality of life and property values through the enforcement of the covenants. Leasing restrictions are thought of by many to be helpful in this regard.

      In addition, any leasing amendments would have to be voted in by a majority of the
homeowners (usually two-thirds or more) before they can take effect. In other words, the final
say is with the homeowners, and they are the ones who will be subject to the consequences of
passing or defeating any proposed restrictions.

Download Article as PDF | Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Mailing Address
Rome & Goldin P.C., Attorneys. 707 Whitlock Ave., Suite E-15 Marietta, GA 30064 map

(770) 428-6002

(770) 428-6003

[email protected]attorneys.com

Documents in Adobe Acrobat PDF format require the free Adobe Reader to view. If you don't have Adobe Reader already, you can Download it here

Association Legal Collections | 2006 - 2009 hoa-attorneys.com